• News
  • Lake Facts
  • About

Lake Scientist

Automated fish taggers will process 30 million Great Lakes salmon and trout

0
  • by Dave Hochanadel
  • — May 26, 2010

Chinook salmon
Manually tagging the roughly 30 million salmon and trout annually stocked into the Great Lakes would be an almost impossible feat. A new $1.4 million automated fish marking and tagging system, however, will make it possible for fisheries biologists to monitor these hatchery-origin fish without committing exorbitant hours of manual labor.

Tracking the population of salmon and trout in the lake became especially important over the last decade as the fish exhibited a decline in body weight and physical condition. It was eventually determined that fisheries were stocking the lake too heavily as natural reproduction was contributing more salmon to the lake than expected.

Many organizations still manually clip the fins and insert coded-wire tags on thousands of fish. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, however, began purchasing automated units to monitor the salmon and trout in the Great Lakes, according to the Green Bay Press Gazette.

The automated system is called the AutoFish, developed for hatcheries monitoring by Northwest Marine Technologies. The Press Gazette describes the system as follows:

A self-contained mobile system in a 44-foot aluminum 5th-wheel trailer, it can sort by length, adipose clip and coded-wire tag fish from 57 to 142 mm without anesthetic or human handling. The salmon and trout are never dewatered during the process, thereby reducing fish stress.

A single unit can process roughly 60,000 fish per day, according to the article.

USF&WS has another AutoFish on the way and is purchasing another two. Eventually the service aims to have seven automated units along with three manual trailers. A similar program is in the works by the Ontario Ministry of natural Resources.

The U.S. program will tend to 26 hatchery facilities that stock salmon and trout. Funding for the USF&WS purchase of the automated units will come from the Great Lakes Restoration Act.

Salmon, trout population analysis goes high-tech [The Green Bay Press Gazette] Image Credit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chinook_salmon,_Oncorhynchus_tshawytscha.jpg

Share

You may also like...

  • Lake Erie Protection Fund awards grants to two Ohio universities
  • Great Lakes Water Levels Update
  • glider to study great lakes fish Michigan State’s Robotic Glider To Study Great Lakes Fish
  • Cuyahoga River Reduced toxicity of Cuyahoga sediment could save millions of dollars

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

BUY AT FONDRIEST.COM
New NexSens XB200 Data Buoy
  • Recent Posts

    • A small mountain pond and fells surrounding Bárrás. August 2006. The region is dominated by arctic lakes and ponds much like this.Research Brief: Measuring Oxygen and Temperature Changes in Arctic Lakes Impacted by Climate ChangeMay 12, 2025
    • Spring 2025 Environmental Monitor Available NowMay 7, 2025
    • Research Brief: CyanoHABs Forecasting in Satellite Monitored LakesMay 5, 2025
    • Supplying Seattle’s Drinking Water: Using Data Buoys to Monitor the Cedar River Municipal WatershedApril 30, 2025
    • A high-mountain lake in Manti-La Sal National Forest.Research Brief: Threats to High-Mountain Lakes in the AlpsApril 28, 2025
  • Popular Tags

    Great Lakes research summary research pollution research brief Lake Erie Algae invasive species Product Spotlight climate change lake research lake science runoff nutrient-loading dissolved oxygen Lake Michigan international temperature Ohio eutrophication EPA toxic waters ice phosphorus USGS

©2025 Fondriest Environmental Inc. | Questions? Call 888.426.2151 or email customercare@fondriest.com