• News
  • Lake Facts
  • About

Lake Scientist

Automated fish taggers will process 30 million Great Lakes salmon and trout

0
  • by Dave Hochanadel
  • — May 26, 2010

Chinook salmon
Manually tagging the roughly 30 million salmon and trout annually stocked into the Great Lakes would be an almost impossible feat. A new $1.4 million automated fish marking and tagging system, however, will make it possible for fisheries biologists to monitor these hatchery-origin fish without committing exorbitant hours of manual labor.

Tracking the population of salmon and trout in the lake became especially important over the last decade as the fish exhibited a decline in body weight and physical condition. It was eventually determined that fisheries were stocking the lake too heavily as natural reproduction was contributing more salmon to the lake than expected.

Many organizations still manually clip the fins and insert coded-wire tags on thousands of fish. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, however, began purchasing automated units to monitor the salmon and trout in the Great Lakes, according to the Green Bay Press Gazette.

The automated system is called the AutoFish, developed for hatcheries monitoring by Northwest Marine Technologies. The Press Gazette describes the system as follows:

A self-contained mobile system in a 44-foot aluminum 5th-wheel trailer, it can sort by length, adipose clip and coded-wire tag fish from 57 to 142 mm without anesthetic or human handling. The salmon and trout are never dewatered during the process, thereby reducing fish stress.

A single unit can process roughly 60,000 fish per day, according to the article.

USF&WS has another AutoFish on the way and is purchasing another two. Eventually the service aims to have seven automated units along with three manual trailers. A similar program is in the works by the Ontario Ministry of natural Resources.

The U.S. program will tend to 26 hatchery facilities that stock salmon and trout. Funding for the USF&WS purchase of the automated units will come from the Great Lakes Restoration Act.

Salmon, trout population analysis goes high-tech [The Green Bay Press Gazette] Image Credit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chinook_salmon,_Oncorhynchus_tshawytscha.jpg

Share

You may also like...

  • Stopping Asian carp with the smell of fear — and fresh fruit
  • No new Great Lakes invasives since 2006
  • Lake Erie Protection Fund awards grants to two Ohio universities
  • Lake Erie Ohio Sea Grant researcher hopes to model Lake Erie dead zone mystery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

FishSens SondeCAM HD
  • Recent Posts

    • Research Brief: Influence of Climate Change and Anthropogenic Stressors on HABs in Zhanjiang BaySeptember 22, 2023
    • From the Tap: Source Water Monitoring for Public HealthSeptember 18, 2023
    • Red swamp crawfishResearch Brief: Using Red Swamp Crayfish as Bioindicators of Microplastic PollutionSeptember 15, 2023
    • Choosing the Right Water Quality Monitoring Systems Is Crucial for Stantec Inc.September 11, 2023
    • Elâzığ, TurkeyResearch Brief: Zebra Mussels as Sentinel Species for Monitoring MicroplasticsSeptember 8, 2023
  • Popular Tags

    Great Lakes research research summary pollution Lake Erie invasive species Product Spotlight Algae runoff international Lake Michigan nutrient-loading Ohio dissolved oxygen EPA research brief eutrophication temperature toxic waters climate change USGS phosphorus ice Asian Carp Michigan

©2023 Fondriest Environmental Inc. | Questions? Call 888.426.2151 or email customercare@fondriest.com