• News
  • Lake Facts
  • About

Lake Scientist

Struggling Crater Lake Mazama Newts

0
  • by Daniel Kelly
  • — December 8, 2015

No good deed goes unpunished, as the saying goes. And despite the good intentions that Crater Lake National Park managers had back in 1915, stocking crayfish in the lake is an excellent example of well-intentioned folks having their plans backfire.

Following the stocking of fish (trout, salmon, other gamefish) in the lake to attract fishermen more than 100 years ago, park managers stocked crayfish there to provide the fish with a food source. That has turned out to be worse than stocking the non-native fish in the first place, researchers from the park have found.

While stocking the fish drastically upended the food chain in Crater Lake, chiefly by forcing the endemic Mazama newt out of its top-predator spot, adding the crayfish has threatened the newts’ survival entirely.

crater_lake_pano

Crater Lake, Oregon. (Credit: Flickr User Jonathan Miske via Creative Commons 2.0)

Scientists working at the national park have been documenting the impacts of the crayfish to Crater Lake and the rare newts within the past decade.

The effects that the crayfish have had are wide-ranging. For one, park managers have found that a lot of different creatures, including the Mazama newts, just don’t hang around if crayfish are present. These include the likes of snails, caddisflies and mayflies.

A good example of this is the distribution changes that park managers have observed between the years of 2008 and 2014. In just six years, Mazama newts have gone from living in more than half of Crater Lake’s shallow areas to inhabiting less than a quarter of them.

mazama_newts_Crater_Lake_map_2008

In 2008, scientists found newts (blue dots) occupied about half of Crater Lake’s shoreline while crayfish (red dots) had most of the rest. (Credit: Madeleine Pisaneschi / KCTS9 Seattle, Oregon Public Broadcasting)

mazama_newts_Crater_Lake_map_2014

By 2014, the crayfish (red dots) had taken over 75 percent of Crater Lake’s shallows, displacing the Mazama newts (blue dots). (Credit: Madeleine Pisaneschi / KCTS9 Seattle, Oregon Public Broadcasting)

But not only does the presence of crayfish serve as a strong deterrent to other species, the crab-like creatures back up their reputation with their predatory abilities. They eat pretty much everything, including algae, plants, aquatic insects, worms and snails. The crayfish eat amphibians, tiny fish and even each other if they have to. Dead or alive, a meal is a meal for them.

These ruthless advantages have led the scientists studying the crayfish to call them the perfect invaders. And they are further buoyed by the Mazama newts’ evolutionary loss (from having no competition for so long) of its main weapon: a neurotoxin strong enough to kill most creatures.

The crayfish have benefited by rising populations throughout the lake, scientists say. In addition to giving them strength in numbers, the surge has also forced them to branch out and find new shallows to live in. Warmer water temperatures in Crater Lake, which have gone up nearly 3 degrees in the past 10 years, may also be aiding the bottom-feeders by making them more active and helping their breeding cycles.

mazama_newt_national_park_service

A mazama newt. (Credit: National Park Service)

To combat the crayfish, scientists with the park as well as nearby universities are throwing a number of things their way. These include routine trawls for the crayfish, in addition to emerging methods to keep them away from Mazama newt populations, like fences. The researchers are also working to better track crayfish as they move around the lake by injecting them with a blue polymer that hardens under their shells to stick with them for life.

But so far the measures aren’t making much of a dent. After recent expeditions to remove thousands of crayfish from Crater Lake, their populations were found to still be growing. Putting up fences may not be a feasible option either, as scientists are concerned that the structures could damage the pristine lake’s aesthetic appeal or other habitats.

Should Crater Lake National Park have been stocked with fish or crayfish decades ago? What methods might work to stem the rise of crayfish there? Please leave a comment and share your thoughts.

Share

You may also like...

  • Stopping Asian carp with the smell of fear — and fresh fruit
  • lakes meteors Lakes Made By Meteors
  • Future uncertain for Great Lakes temperatures
  • imapinvasives Research Summary: Tracking Water Chestnut and Other Invasive Species in Pennsylvania Lakes and Waterways Using iMapInvasives

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

BUY AT FONDRIEST.COM
New NexSens XB200 Data Buoy
  • Recent Posts

    • Carbon and Nutrient Monitoring in the Great Lakes Using Satellite ObservationsJune 11, 2025
    • Craig Hill places the Spotter Buoy into Lake Superior near Park Point Beach in Duluth, MN.Research Brief: Evaluating Wave Energy Availability in the Great Lakes and Blue Economy Opportunities June 9, 2025
    • Restoring North Texas Streams to Historical FlowsJune 9, 2025
    • Wind surfing on Lake Michigan.Research Brief: Evaluating ICESat-2 Performance in Wave Height PredictionsJune 2, 2025
    • Research Brief: Monitoring and Predicting CyanoHABs using Sentinel-3 OLCI Satellite ImageryMay 26, 2025
  • Popular Tags

    Great Lakes research summary research research brief pollution Lake Erie Algae invasive species Product Spotlight climate change lake research lake science runoff nutrient-loading Lake Michigan international dissolved oxygen temperature Ohio eutrophication EPA toxic waters ice phosphorus blue-green algae

©2025 Fondriest Environmental Inc. | Questions? Call 888.426.2151 or email customercare@fondriest.com